LogoMakeClipAI
  • 首页
  • 价格
  • 展示
  • Trending
  • 博客
  • 文档
AI video model comparison: Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.0, Hailuo, and LTX Video
2026/06/08

AI video model comparison: Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.0, Hailuo, and LTX Video

I tested 4 AI video models side by side with the same prompts. Here's exactly when to use Kling, Seedance, Hailuo, or LTX — and what each one actually costs.

I spent a week running the same prompts through four AI video models on MakeClipAI. Same text, same scene descriptions. The goal: figure out which model to use for which scenario.

Here's the guide I wish I had when I started.

The models I tested

MakeClipAI gives you access to multiple models under one account. The four I tested are:

  • Kling 3.0 — Kwai's video model. Known for cinematic motion and polished commercial looks.
  • Seedance 2.0 — A Japanese model from Marvelous. Strong on character animation and expressive motion.
  • Hailuo — Minimax's video model. Good for stylized, artistic visuals with a softer natural look.
  • LTX Video — Focused on speed. Lower quality ceiling but much faster generation.

Test 1: Product reveal — "a luxury watch on a wooden surface, slow camera orbit, soft studio lighting"

ModelQualitySpeedNotes
Kling 3.0★★★★★~3 minBest result. Watch texture was sharp, lighting felt premium. The orbit motion was smooth — looked like an actual commercial.
Seedance 2.0★★★★☆~4 minGood quality but the motion felt slightly different from what I described. More "alive" than polished.
Hailuo★★★☆☆~4 minSofter look, less sharp. The lighting was nice but the watch lost some detail.
LTX Video★★☆☆☆~1 minFastest by far. Quality is noticeably lower — usable for testing concepts, not for final output.

Verdict for product reveals: Use Kling. It's built for this.

Test 2: Character animation — "a dancer in a flowing dress, expressive movement, warm sunset lighting"

ModelQualitySpeedNotes
Seedance 2.0★★★★★~4 minClear winner. The motion was more natural and expressive. The dress movement looked organic.
Kling 3.0★★★★☆~3 minGood but the motion was more rigid. Better for a fashion commercial than artistic expression.
Hailuo★★★★☆~4 minInteresting stylized look. The colors were warmer, more painterly. Good for artistic projects.
LTX Video★★☆☆☆~1 minMotion was choppy. Skip this for character work.

Verdict for character animation: Seedance 2.0 handles expressive motion best. Hailuo is a nice alternative if you want a stylized look.

Test 3: Fast turnaround — "a social media ad for a coffee shop, 5-second clip"

ModelQualitySpeedNotes
LTX Video★★★☆☆~45 secGood enough for social media. The quality won't win awards but the speed is unmatched.
Kling 3.0★★★★★~3 minBeautiful but do you need it for a coffee shop clip that's gone in 24 hours?
Seedance 2.0★★★★☆~4 minBetter quality than LTX but takes longer. Tradeoff depends on your deadline.
Hailuo★★★☆☆~4 minStylized look can work for artistic brands. Not great for generic coffee shop content.

Verdict for speed: LTX Video when you need something fast. Kling when you need it to look great.

Credit costs compared

ModelCost per generation
LTX VideoLowest credits
HailuoLow credits
Seedance 2.0Medium credits
Kling 3.0Higher credits

The expensive models aren't always the right choice. I've saved a lot of credits by using LTX for early drafts and switching to Kling or Seedance for the final version.

My decision framework

I use this mental model now:

Kling → Product demos, commercial ads, anything that needs to look premium Seedance → Character animation, dance, expressive scenes, lifestyle content Hailuo → Artistic projects, stylized visuals, creative concepts LTX → First drafts, social media throwaways, testing prompt ideas before using the expensive models

Bottom line

The best model isn't the most expensive one. It's the one that matches what you're trying to make.

If you're making a product video for your Shopify store, don't use Seedance — use Kling. If you're animating a character dance, don't use LTX — use Seedance.

Get specific about what you need, then pick the model that's built for it. Your videos (and your credit balance) will thank you.

For multi-scene projects, AI Director mode automatically selects the best model for each scene and handles the breakdown — no manual model switching needed.

全部文章

作者

avatar for MakeClipAI
MakeClipAI

分类

  • 产品
The models I testedTest 1: Product reveal — "a luxury watch on a wooden surface, slow camera orbit, soft studio lighting"Test 2: Character animation — "a dancer in a flowing dress, expressive movement, warm sunset lighting"Test 3: Fast turnaround — "a social media ad for a coffee shop, 5-second clip"Credit costs comparedMy decision frameworkBottom line

更多文章

From prompt to video: my complete AI video workflow for Instagram
产品
精选指南新手友好

From prompt to video: my complete AI video workflow for Instagram

I make 5 AI videos for Instagram every week. Here's my complete workflow from blank page to published Reel — including the prompts I use.

avatar for MakeClipAI
MakeClipAI
2026/05/14
阅读指南 →
Image to video: How to animate your product photos with AI
产品
实用指南新手友好

Image to video: How to animate your product photos with AI

Stop reshooting product videos. Here's how to turn photos you already have into AI-generated product demos, social clips, and ads — with tips for consistent results.

avatar for MakeClipAI
MakeClipAI
2026/06/08
阅读指南 →
Gemini Omni Video:Google 多模态视频模型正式登陆 MakeClipAI
动态产品
实用指南新手友好

Gemini Omni Video:Google 多模态视频模型正式登陆 MakeClipAI

Google 的 Gemini Omni Video 现已上线 MakeClipAI。这是平台首个真正多模态的视频模型——一次请求即可同时传入图片、视频片段、角色参考和音频。

avatar for MakeClipAI
MakeClipAI
2026/05/22
阅读指南 →
LogoMakeClipAI

用更简单的方式制作产品视频、广告视频和社媒短片。

Email

订阅产品动态

获取 MakeClipAI 的产品更新、新模型上线和工作流能力发布。

产品
  • 价格
  • 展示
  • 提示词指南
  • Seedance 2.0
  • Omni AI 视频
资源
  • 博客
  • 文档
  • 更新日志
公司
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
法律
  • Cookie政策
  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • 退款政策
  • 可接受使用政策
  • DMCA Policy
© 2026 MakeClipAI All Rights Reserved.